Welcome Guest, Please Login or Register!
Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Support RL
Home Forum Aquarium Log Gallery Sponsors RHO Bookstore

More misinformation from Discovery Channel

Go Back   Reeflands Forum > General > Anything But Reefkeeping
Sponsored Links
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-10-2002, 03:22 PM   #1
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 20,691
Arrow More misinformation from Discovery Channel

From the same people who told us that a single crown of thorns starfish "can eat up to 13 square miles of coral per year," we now learn that Mars was subjected to a period of major bombardment only 3.5 million years ago: "Teresa Segura and her thesis director, professor Owen Toon — both from the University of Colorado — used photographs of Mars and computers to calculate the effects of the impacts of asteroids that bombarded the planet some 3.5 million years ago." http://dsc.discovery.com/news/briefs...212967387#jump

This is obviously another example of so-called science writers who learned everything they know about science during their employment at the National Enquirer and editors who are either non-existent or incompetent.

There is no way that Mars was hit with a period of major bombardment 3.5 million years ago or earth would have experienced the same thing. The period of major bombardment on earth was 3.5 - 4 billion years ago.

There is no way that a single starfish can eat 13 square miles of coral per year. The correct figure is 5 - 6 square meters per year, although an especially large specimen might be able to eat 13 square meters per year. One would have expected that someone at Discovery would have questioned the figure of 13 square miles per year. That's on a par with saying that Santa Claus visits every home in the world in a single night.

I just re-checked their website to see if they ever got around to correcting their "cool facts" section that claims a single starfish eats 13 square miles of coral per year and the answer is no, it's still in there, believe it or not: http://animal.discovery.com/news/afp...49.84613553719
__________________
Ninong
Ninong is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

Old 12-10-2002, 04:42 PM   #2
Citizen
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Grand Blanc, MI
Posts: 223
Re: More misinformation from Discovery Channel

"That's on a par with saying that Santa Claus visits every home in the world in a single night."



WHAT!?!?............You mean he doesn't?

This Christmas just won't be the same.
reddhaus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2002, 10:26 PM   #3
Evil Czar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 1,001
Send a message via AIM to hcp28
Thanks Ninong I don't know how I'm going to explain that one to my jr. highs. Good things they don't visit many reefboards lets keep this one under our hats.
__________________
Tragedy is when I cut my finger. Comedy is when you fall down an open manhole and die.
-Mel Brooks
hcp28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2002, 02:55 PM   #4
Tenant
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: This Giant World
Posts: 89
Re: Re: More misinformation from Discovery Channel

Quote:
Originally posted by reddhaus
"That's on a par with saying that Santa Claus visits every home in the world in a single night."



WHAT!?!?............You mean he doesn't?

This Christmas just won't be the same.
Settle down. this is false info also!
Skunk Clown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2002, 06:25 PM   #5
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 20,691
I sent Teresa Segura an email on Dec. 11th. asking her if I was correct in assuming that the "science" writer at Discovery had screwed up her findings. Here is her reply that I just received today:


Hello Mr. Davis,

I apologize for the delay in getting back to you. Yes, the word "million" is incorrect. It should read "3.5 billion years ago." The size of the impactors is correct but these impacts occurred in the early history of the planet, 3.5 - 4 billion years ago, and as far as we know there is no evidence of these large impact events in recent history.

Sincerely,

Teresa Segura
__________________
Ninong
Ninong is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2002, 03:49 PM   #6
Moderator
 
schrocat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Hilliard , Fl.
Posts: 3,392
What about the 13 square miles of annual starfish dining?

Any mention of perhaps fixing it?
__________________
"One man's vulgarity is another man's lyric"
-Justice John Marshall Harlan

"Send Lawyers, Guns and Money."
-WZ
schrocat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2002, 05:54 PM   #7
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 20,691
Schrocat,

Teresa Segura has nothing to do with Discovery. Her research was totally misrepresented by their science writer just as the article on starfish was screwed up.

In fact, they really did a number on her findings when they changed the time frame from 3.5 billion years ago to only 3.5 million years ago and then went on to claim that "some 25 meteorites ranging from 60 to 150 miles in diameter shower Mars every 10 to 20 million years" at the present time. They incorrectly placed her claim in the present instead of something that happened 3.5 billion years ago.

"Teresa Segura and her thesis director, professor Owen Toon — both from the University of Colorado — used photographs of Mars and computers to calculate the effects of the impacts of asteroids that bombarded the planet some 3.5 million years ago."

"The clash of asteroids and meteorites that collided with Mars unleashed frozen water, which released brief bouts of torrential rains and created the planet's canyons and river valleys, they believe.

"According to Segura, some 25 meteorites ranging from 60 to 150 miles in diameter shower Mars every 10 to 20 million years, producing periodic layers of hot debris that have covered the surface, warming it above the freezing point of water for decades or centuries at a stretch."

It's just another example of the popular press misrepresenting everything they get their hands on. A few months ago they were all jumping up and down claiming that recent studies proved that global warming was not taking place. It didn't seem to phaze them too much when the scientists who published the referenced studies held a press conference to say that their studies proved no such thing.

When I was 11 years old I found a stupid item in a little corner of the comic strips in the Sunday paper called "Amazing Science Facts." Amazing was an understatement. It was sponsored by Wrigley's chewing gum. Anyway, they claimed that light from the sun takes a full 7 seconds to reach Earth. I sent them a letter telling them that my friend Albert Einstein and I were both amazed alright and asked if they had just discovered that the speed of light was a lot faster than 186,000 miles per second or if they had determined that Earth was a lot closer to the sun than 150 million kilometers. They thanked me for being such a little smartass and sent me a carton of Doublemint Gum.
__________________
Ninong
Ninong is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:25 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0 Release Candidate 3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0 ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81