I can't justify this given the room I have, but has anyone considered doing a gravity fed counter-current design? Basically, siphon the water off at one end and dump it into the sump at the other. Obviously, it needs a water flow control to stop the thing overflowing.
I has this idea while contemplating a new counter-current to replace my fundamentally flawed Seaclone. No wonder those things cause so much heartache! According to an article I just read, they do almost everything wrong: even though they look good to the untrained eye.
The main thing that this Skimmer Design 101 article raises with the Seaclone is that it uses a cyclone effect in the reaction tube. Not only that, it's a with-current design that uses a lousy venturi.
It's the swirl in the reaction chamber that seems to blow anything this design has going for it. Some molecules have a very fragile bond to the bubbles so the cyclone is probably throwing them off!
The fix (not my idea, Wozza found this) is to fit an airstone (dangle it in fact) into the reaction chamber about 1/4 way down to disturb the cyclone. This has the result of pushing more air IN and slowing the turbulence at the top. Even with a cheap 1/2" round fizzer from the LFS the results are visible and astonishing.
Now I'm not going to pretend this is perfect, but the proof of the puddling is in the amount of skimmate that this Rube Goldberg/Heath Robinson design is producing: from none (yes, not a drop) to a healthy flow.
I'm dropping the Seaclone and going with a home-brew counter current up to 5' high if I can hide it. If anyone is interested, I'll post the results as usual.



LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks

Reply With Quote



