Just an idea I'm kickin around. If anybody thinks they may know the answer to this, please let me know...
I want to do a coast to coast overflow, and instead of the usual back wall placement, I was wondering if it might be possible to run it front to back in the middle of the tank.
If I was to cut the top middle plastic support out on my 120 Glass tank, would I be able to replace it with glass panels siliconed to the front and rear glass faces? Would that hold? Sort of like eurobracing...see the graphic below.
The thought is that you lose a little area in the back when you do a C2C (at least it creates a shadow) on the back wall. Add to that the plastic center brace and a fairly big portion of the overall top surface area is blocking light into the tank. So my thought is why not get rid of the plastic center brace, and put the overflow (with the same rough width dimensions) where it was? As long as the silicone bond is strong enough, the C2C would replace the plastic as the top structural tie for the front and rear panels.
I'd keep the rest of the plastic surround on the top edges...just cut out the middle. It would need to go in order to access the C2C trough for cleanout, maintenance etc. I'd still have the full 48 linear inches of cacade, but it would be coming from two sides instead of one continuous length along the back.
It would be plumbed with the beananimal overflow method, but instead of exiting the back of the tank at a right angle, it would just go straight down through the bottom of the tank into the sump. Return line plumbing placement would be pretty flexible with this design...I'd probably just come up over the back wall.
I plan to make my own rock for this one, so a middle pier structure will be formed to hide the overflow plumbing.
What do we think about the bracing issue?



LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote

