Welcome Guest, Please Login or Register!
Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Support RL
Home Forum Aquarium Log Gallery Sponsors RHO Bookstore

URI ballast by Icecap

Go Back   Reeflands Forum > Equipment > Lighting
Sponsored Links
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-10-2004, 01:20 PM   #1
Council
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: right now NM, originally from RI
Posts: 276
URI ballast by Icecap

Hey whats up fellas! Just wanted to get your opinion on this ballast. I think this may be the one I get, and retro-fit 4 VHO's into my canopy. It looks like a good deal, and quality ballast by Icecap, but I'd like to get an outside opinion. Let me know what you think. Thanks.

http://www.northcoastmarines.com/lighting.htm Its the URI A4 Ballast


Leddy
Leddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

Old 04-10-2004, 01:28 PM   #2
Moderator
 
Poseidon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Swartz Creek, MI
Posts: 6,358
Send a message via AIM to Poseidon
Looks good, but an ICECAP 660 is only $10 more... I would spend the extra money myself...
__________________
Need a Photographer?

Just say NO to CRABS

Mike
Poseidon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2004, 03:05 PM   #3
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 20,311
Quote:
Originally Posted by Poseidon
Looks good, but an ICECAP 660 is only $10 more... I would spend the extra money myself...
I would probably spend the extra money, too, but it's $29 more!

__________________
Ninong
Ninong is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2004, 03:35 PM   #4
Moderator
 
Poseidon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Swartz Creek, MI
Posts: 6,358
Send a message via AIM to Poseidon
Oops sorry should have mentioned I was quoting a price from www.oceanencounter.com
__________________
Need a Photographer?

Just say NO to CRABS

Mike
Poseidon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2004, 05:52 PM   #5
Council
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: right now NM, originally from RI
Posts: 276
What would be the difference? I'm not really familiar with ballasts, but it seems the A4 is the 660, just under the URI name. I'll look around for the 660's, but I'm gonna keep that URI one in mind. Thanks for the replies.



Leddy
Leddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2004, 06:01 PM   #6
Moderator
 
Poseidon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Swartz Creek, MI
Posts: 6,358
Send a message via AIM to Poseidon
The URI version loses the dimmer and the heatsink. Plus warranty would be URI not ICECAP...
__________________
Need a Photographer?

Just say NO to CRABS

Mike
Poseidon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2004, 06:07 PM   #7
Council
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: right now NM, originally from RI
Posts: 276
Cool, now I see. 20-30$ isn't too much of a difference I guess. I'm gonna look into it a little more, plus I was just at work talking to my boss about a lighting supply company in town where I could probably find good deals on ballasts. I'm gonna give em a call to see if they carry Icecap's, figure it couldn't hurt to try. Thanks for the info.


Leddy
Leddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2004, 03:48 PM   #8
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Spokane Valley WA
Posts: 2,436
They are made and supported by IceCap. I run a dozen or so of them and they perform just the same as the IceCap 660 model. No reason to spend the extra money unless you plan on using the dimmer feature IMO.

Regards,
Kevin
__________________
SPSguy
On - On
kevinpo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2004, 09:52 PM   #9
Council
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: right now NM, originally from RI
Posts: 276
Thanks kevin, thats good to hear. Is that dimmer port worth it? I don't think I'll really use it, all I want is 4 VHO bulbs, and if that URI ballast is pretty much the 660 Icecap, why not. Seems good to me. Thanks for the replies and input.



Leddy
Leddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2004, 04:57 PM   #10
Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Cherry Hill, NJ
Posts: 482
The dimmer requires that you use a Solar controller, which is fairly pricey. The dimming is pretty touchy, requires that the bulbs be attached to a special ground plane, and antecdotally seems to be associated with premature ballast and bulb failure. I would personally avoid dimming like the plague, but some people successfully use this feature.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Leddy
Thanks kevin, thats good to hear. Is that dimmer port worth it? I don't think I'll really use it, all I want is 4 VHO bulbs, and if that URI ballast is pretty much the 660 Icecap, why not. Seems good to me. Thanks for the replies and input.



Leddy
dougc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2004, 06:06 PM   #11
Council
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: right now NM, originally from RI
Posts: 276
Thanks for the info doug. I appreciate it. That might be the one I go with, money is a bit tight right now though. Thanks again.


Leddy
Leddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2004, 08:02 PM   #12
Moderator
 
Poseidon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Swartz Creek, MI
Posts: 6,358
Send a message via AIM to Poseidon
Quote:
Originally Posted by kevinpo
They are made and supported by IceCap. I run a dozen or so of them and they perform just the same as the IceCap 660 model. No reason to spend the extra money unless you plan on using the dimmer feature IMO.

Regards,
Kevin
If Kevin says it is good, then IT IS GOOD!!! I'd say go for it!
__________________
Need a Photographer?

Just say NO to CRABS

Mike
Poseidon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2004, 11:18 PM   #13
Council
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: right now NM, originally from RI
Posts: 276
Cool cool cool . I'll order it up when I get my tax refund. How high above the surface should I mount them? I think I may have to shorten my canopy since its about 9-10" tall. That won't be a problem at all though. I read somewhere from like 4-6" is recommended. Excellent, thanks everyone for the replies and info.


Leddy

Also, would I be better off taking out the glass canopy when I get these lights mounted? It's on there now cause of the NO hood, but was wondering if it'd be good to remove it all together when the VHO's are mounted. Just thought I'd ask so I know down the road.
Leddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2004, 11:34 PM   #14
Owner
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Bardstown, KY
Posts: 13,044
Yes definitely remove the glass tops. Not only will they reduce the amount of light that will penetrate into the tank they can reduce the amount of gas/oxygen exchange.

Scott Z.
Reefland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2004, 01:10 AM   #15
Council
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: right now NM, originally from RI
Posts: 276
Cool, thanks Scott.


Leddy
Leddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2004, 09:39 AM   #16
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Spokane Valley WA
Posts: 2,436
VHO's should be mounted as close to the water as possible if you're using them alone without MH's. The closer to the water the more intensity and pentration of the water. They are cool enough to lay right on the glass if you want.

HTH,
Kevin
__________________
SPSguy
On - On
kevinpo is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LN ballast versus "New" IceCap jsaltzgi Lighting 2 06-19-2003 08:02 PM
icecap 175mh ballast, 2 bulb, icecap timer, pendant sean2sean For Sale or Trade Zone 0 06-16-2003 09:26 AM
New IceCap 3000 ballast Techy-Mechy For Sale or Trade Zone 2 02-08-2003 10:44 PM
Want to Trade for icecap Ballast and endcaps for icecap fans (4) Barry N. For Sale or Trade Zone 0 11-24-2001 10:08 AM
Icecap Ballast Question bbrook Lighting 1 07-17-2001 08:30 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:53 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0 Release Candidate 3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0 ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79