Welcome Guest, Please Login or Register!
Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Support RL
Home Forum Aquarium Log Gallery Sponsors RHO Bookstore

Tank not bright enough with new MH????

Go Back   Reeflands Forum > Equipment > Lighting
Sponsored Links
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-03-2004, 11:28 AM   #1
Citizen
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 214
Tank not bright enough with new MH????

I just installed two (2) 250 Watt Ushio 10,000k MH lights 9 inches above the water level with no glass tops.

The tank is 20 inches deep and 48 inches long. I kept the lights away from the glass support in the middle of the tank, so there is some shade in the middle of the tank.

I can live with that, but the tank appears to be less bright than it was with 300 watts of PC lights (actinic and 10,000k).

Everything that I read says that the 250W Bulbs are plenty , but the tank is not that bright. Are the 2 250 W MH enough for my tank?

I want to put some SPS in there. If so, How low below the water level or better yet below the light should I place them?

Thanks,
Dive_Master is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

Old 08-03-2004, 05:51 PM   #2
Just Moved In
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Rochester Hills, MI
Posts: 9
2X - 250 watt MH is plenty... as far as them appearing dim, I must ask a very silly question, but one that needs to be asked... you are using a reflector with them correct? If so, what kind of reflector? Perpendicular orf horizontal design, or are you using a pendant of some kind? Also, are the bulbs new, or did you get them used from someone?

It is not uncommon for the MH to "seem" a little less bright with the naked eye... this is due to the refraction of the light source within the water column and the resulting shimmer lines, etc. PC fluorescent lighting always "appears" much brighter than it really is.

As for the acros under your 250 watt lights, all acros should be great in the top half of the water and most species could easily be kept in the bottom half (based upon your stated 20" depth).

Give yourself some time to adjust, make sure you are using a high-quality reflector (as opposed to a flat piece of sheet metal), and replace the bulbs if they are older used ones (if older than 9 months, replace them to be on the cautious side).

More importantly... ENJOY!
Jimbob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2004, 06:06 PM   #3
Citizen
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 214
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimbob
2X - 250 watt MH is plenty... as far as them appearing dim, I must ask a very silly question, but one that needs to be asked... you are using a reflector with them correct? If so, what kind of reflector? Perpendicular orf horizontal design, or are you using a pendant of some kind? Also, are the bulbs new, or did you get them used from someone?

It is not uncommon for the MH to "seem" a little less bright with the naked eye... this is due to the refraction of the light source within the water column and the resulting shimmer lines, etc. PC fluorescent lighting always "appears" much brighter than it really is.

As for the acros under your 250 watt lights, all acros should be great in the top half of the water and most species could easily be kept in the bottom half (based upon your stated 20" depth).

Give yourself some time to adjust, make sure you are using a high-quality reflector (as opposed to a flat piece of sheet metal), and replace the bulbs if they are older used ones (if older than 9 months, replace them to be on the cautious side).

More importantly... ENJOY!
tHANKS,

i AM USING SPIDER TYPE (high polished) REFLECTOR. as INSTRUCTED BY THE manufacturer, I installed these perpendicular to the front of the tank.
Dive_Master is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2004, 10:00 AM   #4
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Spokane Valley WA
Posts: 2,424
Are they mogul mount or double ended bulbs? If mogul mount be sure the nipples on the inner envelope of the bulb are pointed up when you screw the bulb in.

HTH,
Kevin
__________________
SPSguy
On - On
kevinpo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2004, 04:58 PM   #5
Citizen
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 214
Quote:
Originally Posted by kevinpo
Are they mogul mount or double ended bulbs? If mogul mount be sure the nipples on the inner envelope of the bulb are pointed up when you screw the bulb in.

HTH,
Kevin
Thanks, but why is that important? They are pointing down after I screwed them in.
Dive_Master is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2004, 11:54 PM   #6
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Spokane Valley WA
Posts: 2,424
I thought they might be

"When pointed down, the nipple tends to collect condensed halides when the lamp cools down. These halides tend to not vaporize as easily down in the pocket of the nipple when the lamp is reignited, so the nipple tends to darken prematurely from the collected halides. This cuts down on the light output somewhat, but more importantly, the darkened nipple heats up more than the surrounding bulb since it begins to absorb light energy. This localized heating tends to result in degradation of the quartz envelope over time called devitrification. Since the nipple is already the weakest point of the bulb this can result in the bulb rupturing."

The above quote is from Ken who does testing of metal halide bulbs for a living.


To get them to tighten at a different position turn off the power and wait till they cool then reach down into the bottom of the socket. There should be a small tab where the end of the bulb makes contact. Gently pull this up so that when you screw the bulb in, it contacts sooner. You will be surprised at the result.

Halide bulbs also need 80 -100 hours of burn in time to reach their final color and brightness.

Regards,
Kevin
PS: Here is a link to an article you might find interesting. Note the section titled Bulb orientation:

http://www.advancedaquarist.com/issu...03/feature.htm
__________________
SPSguy
On - On
kevinpo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2004, 11:21 PM   #7
Citizen
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 214
Quote:
Originally Posted by kevinpo
I thought they might be

"When pointed down, the nipple tends to collect condensed halides when the lamp cools down. These halides tend to not vaporize as easily down in the pocket of the nipple when the lamp is reignited, so the nipple tends to darken prematurely from the collected halides. This cuts down on the light output somewhat, but more importantly, the darkened nipple heats up more than the surrounding bulb since it begins to absorb light energy. This localized heating tends to result in degradation of the quartz envelope over time called devitrification. Since the nipple is already the weakest point of the bulb this can result in the bulb rupturing."

The above quote is from Ken who does testing of metal halide bulbs for a living.


To get them to tighten at a different position turn off the power and wait till they cool then reach down into the bottom of the socket. There should be a small tab where the end of the bulb makes contact. Gently pull this up so that when you screw the bulb in, it contacts sooner. You will be surprised at the result.

Halide bulbs also need 80 -100 hours of burn in time to reach their final color and brightness.

Regards,
Kevin
PS: Here is a link to an article you might find interesting. Note the section titled Bulb orientation:

http://www.advancedaquarist.com/issu...03/feature.htm

Thanks for your info and the article I found helpful.

I changed the mogul socket around so now the nipple is pointing up. I already see the difference (small but noticeble).

Thanks for your help.
Dive_Master is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
HELP-I have Styrofoam under my tank!!! BigLar Tanks, Filtration & Basic Equipment 30 12-20-2001 04:37 PM
Does anyone have this MH on there tank schrader mo Lighting 0 12-17-2001 02:22 PM
Japanese reef tank PICS? scubadude Reef Aquariums 38 10-20-2001 06:10 AM
custom new tank (does this look ok to build tell me what you think) wuelfman Tanks, Filtration & Basic Equipment 6 07-27-2001 07:47 PM
Moving Tank to Work... couple questions Justler Saltwater (Fish-Only) Aquariums 2 07-25-2001 12:41 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:14 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0 Release Candidate 3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0 ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78