I wouldn't mount PC lamps 13" from the water. They can, and should, be mounted closer for maximum effectiveness and efficiency. If we are talking about just PC lamps by themselves, I see no reason to mount them more than 4" above the water unless you run into heat issues.
I wouldn't believe the claim that "PC generates twice the intensity of VHO." That seems overstated, if you ask me. I do not believe that a 96w PC lamp generates twice the intensity of a 95w VHO lamp. The only measurement that counts is the quantity and quality of the light incident on the particular coral surface. You can measure that in PAR with an Apogee PAR meter (~$400) or you can simply measure the lux with an inexpensive luxmeter (~$100).
You can keep a wide variety of corals under your proposed lighting provided you exercise judgment in their placement. You can probably keep certain host sea anemones, too, provided you feed them regularly. Whether you can keep Tridacna clams or not is open to debate. The question then becomes one of what is ideal vs. what might work. There is not much doubt that high light intensity is required to maintain the brilliant mantle coloration of electric grade T. crocea and ultra grade T. maxima but some people do keep clams in tanks without metal halides. T. derasa requires less light than T. crocea or T. maxima and you might be able to keep one of those since your tank is relatively shallow. Daniel Knop, a popular authority on Tridacna clams, recommends a minimum of 250w metal halide lighting as ideal for all species, but many people seem to get by with less than that.



LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote



Bookmarks