Welcome to the Reef Forum.
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    Just Moved In
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    Melbourne, Fl
    Posts
    39
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    MH Lighting Question

    As I dig deeper into my tank and the posibilities, specifically around lighting, I am at a crossroads and was hoping for some direction. I have two 175 MH for my 75 gallon tank. For the time being, I am pretty happy with 350 watts, which is approximate 4.7 W per gallon. I eventually would like to supplement deep actinics with 110w of PC.
    Today while at my LFS, the shop keeper introduced me to 15K bulbs. Since this is the halfway point between 10K and 20K, it really gives a nice color to the tank. My earlier thought was to go with 10K MH and suppliment actinics using PC. After seeing these bulbs, I believe I can get good color and spend the 200 for PC on something else (pumps, etc, live rock, etc). I am just not shooting for color, I want to give the animals the appropriate lighting they need as well.

    Here comes my questions:

    1. Is there any downsides to going this route? Is there any corals that will not flourish in 15K?

    2. From what I read and what people have suggested, the concept of how much light is enough always seems to elude me. I have had someone tell me that 2X250 W MH is plenty of lighting for a 75, yet another say that 2X250 is overkill and that 2 X 150 would be plenty. I went with 175. Is there a rule of thumb when it comes to lighting? I have read that you should have anywhere between 3-6 W of lighting per gallon. I want to find the yin and yang or balance on this lighting.

    Thanks in advance for any advice you give me.

    Best Regards,

    Joe

  2. #2
    Keeper of Willis charlie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    NW Montana
    Posts
    11,684
    Images
    849
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 22 Times in 21 Posts
    WPG is not a good way of determining anything, what you are looking at is how much your lite will penetrate the water.

    http://www.reeflightinginfo.arvixe.com/articles.htm

    That link is to a bunch of articles by Sanjay Joshi. That ought to about fill up your nite.
    If you can't find it there, you can't find it.
    400 Gallon Reef Log
    Rome wasn't built in a day---neither is a reef

    Willis--1998-2009---I will miss you.

  3. #3
    Moderator Poseidon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Swartz Creek, MI
    Posts
    6,793
    Images
    450
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    The watts per gallon thing is USELESS! It fails to account for the shape of the tank. Think of the difference in a tank that is 100 gallons, but one is 30" tall and the other 18", do you think the light at the bottom of each will be the same if they both have 500W of total light?

    Actually WATTS has very little, if ANYTHING to do with light, you want LUMENS, or in this hobby, PAR, or PPFD.

    The link Charlie gave you is the WINNER, if it is not listed there, DON'T BUY IT!
    Need a Photographer?

    Just say NO to CRABS

    Mike

  4. #4
    Just Moved In
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    MN
    Posts
    37
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Talking

    Quote Originally Posted by Poseidon
    The watts per gallon thing is USELESS! It fails to account for the shape of the tank. Think of the difference in a tank that is 100 gallons, but one is 30" tall and the other 18", do you think the light at the bottom of each will be the same if they both have 500W of total light?

    Actually WATTS has very little, if ANYTHING to do with light, you want LUMENS, or in this hobby, PAR, or PPFD.

    The link Charlie gave you is the WINNER, if it is not listed there, DON'T BUY IT!
    Lumens are USELESS! pay attention to PAR (actually the proper way to do it is measure in Quanta unfortunately most of us dont have the money to purchase a Linear Quanta meter), the problem with lumens is that it is a measurement based on the human eyes' perception of light wich interprets heavily in green.
    PAR is the actual representaion of what drives the Photosynthetic response.
    I personally dont feel that WPG is all that useless just more of a weak guideline that can be use in conjunction with PAR to assist one in a lighting decision.I think most of us know that anything deeper than 24" is going to require a minimum of a 250W MH, at least it seems common knowledge to me.

    JOE, I too have a 75 gallon reef. Ive got 2 175w MH and 260w of PC over the tank.
    I currently keep a variety of corals and inverts primarily SPS and Zoos I also have two clams.
    FWIW


    Matt
    Last edited by Rubisco; 07-14-2006 at 10:19 AM.


 

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. lighting question
    By raycopp in forum Lighting
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 11-14-2005, 01:54 PM
  2. T5 lighting question.
    By prow in forum Lighting
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 05-18-2005, 05:00 PM
  3. lighting question
    By tech1 in forum Lighting
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 01-10-2005, 06:07 PM
  4. another lighting question
    By saltwaterfishlover in forum Lighting
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 09-09-2002, 11:59 AM
  5. Lighting Question?
    By vanillaprice in forum Lighting
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-27-2002, 07:25 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107