400 E-Ballast vs Tar...

TSzetela · 06-19-2001, 09:42 PM

After getting a $245 (not including the AC that is on separate interruptible service) electric bill today I again started to consider switching my 400(s)mh to an electronic ballast. The question is how much electricity does an electronic ballast save over a tar ballast? Some people say anywhere from 10% to 40 %. How long does it take to recover the additional cost in electric savings? What are the actual experiences of all you E-Ballast users?
--------------------

PerryinCA · 06-20-2001, 01:39 PM

Here's a link to Sanjays most recent (to my knowledge) report. According to his findings, the Blueline was a great choice for the 400w lamps both in output, and consumption. They are efficient, and see a slight increase in efficiency in most cases, as well as a lower wattage draw, BUT there was no mention of power factor which will effect electrical consumption. Its a nice ballast in the 400w range, but I don't think you'd see and extreme savings.

Here's the link for some reading:
http://www.personal.psu.edu/faculty/...omparison.html

-Perry

TSzetela · 06-20-2001, 04:49 PM

Thanks Perry,
It seems according to (The Reef master) Sanjay and Dave Morgan that the savings is minimal. Especially when I was considering this would be a replacement for a working ballast not a decision between the two for a new purchase. My savings would workout to be, using the formula from the article and my power cost, 5 cents per day! Not considering the time value of money, my recovery period would be about 8.77 years! I guess I just better remember to turn off the (household) lights when I leave the room!!:lol

06-19-2001, 09:42 PM	#1
TSzetela Just Moved In Join Date: May 2001 Location: "Metro Detroit" Posts: 8	400 E-Ballast vs Tar... After getting a $245 (not including the AC that is on separate interruptible service) electric bill today I again started to consider switching my 400(s)mh to an electronic ballast. The question is how much electricity does an electronic ballast save over a tar ballast? Some people say anywhere from 10% to 40 %. How long does it take to recover the additional cost in electric savings? What are the actual experiences of all you E-Ballast users? -------------------- __________________ Tim

06-20-2001, 04:49 PM	#3
TSzetela Just Moved In Join Date: May 2001 Location: "Metro Detroit" Posts: 8	Thanks Perry, It seems according to (The Reef master) Sanjay and Dave Morgan that the savings is minimal. Especially when I was considering this would be a replacement for a working ballast not a decision between the two for a new purchase. My savings would workout to be, using the formula from the article and my power cost, 5 cents per day! Not considering the time value of money, my recovery period would be about 8.77 years! I guess I just better remember to turn off the (household) lights when I leave the room!!:lol __________________ Tim

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

06-20-2001, 01:39 PM	#2
PerryinCA Governor Join Date: Jul 2000 Location: Folsom, CA Posts: 2,103	Here's a link to Sanjays most recent (to my knowledge) report. According to his findings, the Blueline was a great choice for the 400w lamps both in output, and consumption. They are efficient, and see a slight increase in efficiency in most cases, as well as a lower wattage draw, BUT there was no mention of power factor which will effect electrical consumption. Its a nice ballast in the 400w range, but I don't think you'd see and extreme savings. Here's the link for some reading: http://www.personal.psu.edu/faculty/...omparison.html -Perry

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)