Welcome Guest, Please Login or Register!
Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Support RL
Home Forum Aquarium Log Gallery Sponsors RHO Bookstore

10K Ushio vs 65k Iwaski

Go Back   Reeflands Forum > Equipment > Lighting
Sponsored Links
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-23-2002, 11:58 PM   #1
Tenant
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Claxton,Ga 30417
Posts: 50
10K Ushio vs 65k Iwaski

Trying to decide which bulb is the more intense. Need to replace 55K. wanted some opinions, experiences. I will be using Actinics for supplement. thanks
Reefnut is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

Old 02-24-2002, 07:41 AM   #2
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Alta Loma,Ca
Posts: 2,942
What wattage and ballast are you using?
golfish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2002, 01:21 PM   #3
Governor
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Pacific WA
Posts: 1,220
depending on watts and ballast. i would opt to try AB bulbs. they had 110par and iwaski has 130par on the same ballast= magnetic. AB bulbs before Ushio for intensity=10k. iwaski are good also with actinic= most par. The AB seem to have alot of par for 10k bulbs. Dino on the 250w but 400w Ushio had 99par on magnetic. Ushio is still a good bulb. Alot of par compared to most of the rest 10k. But not more than AB
Ironreef is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2002, 03:21 PM   #4
Governor
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Folsom, CA
Posts: 2,103
For the 250w, for sheer intensity, the Iwasaki is the way to go in my opinion. If you were using a 5500k lamp, I am sure that you have a standard magnetic ballast. Now if you want the best combination of color rendition/PAR out of the lamp, most people will say that the Aqualine, or the Ushio is better for ya. The 250w 'zaki is not as yellow as the 400w, and will look good without too much actinic, but the 10k look is tough to beat.

-Perry
PerryinCA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2003, 02:35 AM   #5
Just Moved In
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: NY
Posts: 22
what do u base this on?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ironreef
depending on watts and ballast. i would opt to try AB bulbs. they had 110par and iwaski has 130par on the same ballast= magnetic. AB bulbs before Ushio for intensity=10k. iwaski are good also with actinic= most par. The AB seem to have alot of par for 10k bulbs. Dino on the 250w but 400w Ushio had 99par on magnetic. Ushio is still a good bulb. Alot of par compared to most of the rest 10k. But not more than AB

Where does all this info on ab having more par the ushio come from ????


Last time i looked sanjay stated ushio de 10ks as having the most par for any 250w bulb ????
greenman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2003, 08:11 AM   #6
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 19,733
Quote:
Originally Posted by greenman
Where does all this info on ab having more par the ushio come from ????


Last time i looked sanjay stated ushio de 10ks as having the most par for any 250w bulb ????
This is a really old thread.

Anyway, AFAIK Sanjay has not published any test results on the 250w AB-10000 lamps, DE or mogul base. He did test the Ushio/BLV 250w 10,000K HQI DE lamp 4 years ago, which is the test you are thinking of. At various times he has tested the 400w Ushio 10,000K lamp and the 400w AB-10000 lamp -- the 400w AB-10000 tested considerably higher in PAR than the 400w Ushio 10,000K lamp which may be where the idea is coming from that AB-10000 (which is really 13,000K) lamps have more PAR than Ushio/BLV lamps.

http://www.personal.psu.edu/faculty/.../aquarium.html
__________________
Ninong
Ninong is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:04 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0 Release Candidate 3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0 ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78