|
||||||
|
|
#1 |
|
Just Moved In
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: San Diego
Posts: 5
|
setting up a prop tank and was thinking of going with two 96 watt pc. Also got a suggestion about going with vhos. Heard they last longer and burn brighter. Would like to know people's experience with vhos and if they do perform better then pcs.
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Governor
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Northern CA
Posts: 2,171
|
vhos look better, last longer, and are cheaper to replace.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Governor
|
I agree 100% that the VHO's are nicer. I had pc's on my first reef and it was nice but i much prefer my vho's. Don't skimp or you could always just get both and use the pc's for actinics. I've considered the same thing but i don't know if i will. I got a feeling my pc's will just collect dust. PC's are nice don't get me wrong but for my meens I like my vho's especially because they were a kit that was already built where as my pc's are diy and well.....never put them in a hood or anything. Good Luck
Jon |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Just Moved In
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Palm Beach Gardens, FL
Posts: 48
|
I've used both and combo of the two on the same tank. VHO is a better deal all the way around IMO.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Owner
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Bardstown, KY
Posts: 13,161
|
Hi chip!
I didn't bother reading any of the responses only your thread title...VHO baby!
Scott Z. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Tenant
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 69
|
No doubt - VHO!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Governor
|
I'm kind of late on this, but I'd go VHO. I have had two tanks one running actinic 03 blue PC and the other Actinic blue VHO and I like the VHOs better. It just seems brighter. And also, the price of the bulbs are a bit cheaper.
-Elmo |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Conflicted Reefer
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Steger, IL
Posts: 516
|
I went VHO.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|