|

|
How much light can I get from this VHO tube? |
|
||||||
|
|
#1 |
|
Just Moved In
|
How much more light can I get from a 3'/95W VHO?
Let's say, in comparison to the 3'/96W PC tubes? I have read "VHO vs. PC" thread, and all of you guys are against PC. I have compared prices for bulbs and 3'/95W VHO I can get around $20 while 3'96W PC costs around $40-45. Ballasts for VHOs, I assume, are cheaper also... So what's the deal? If VHO is so much better, brighter and cheaper - why would ANYBODY buy PC? Companies making PC should go broke in the notime... but they dont! What benefits of PC am I missing in that picture? I am asking with a reason: I am going to upgrage my lights. I have 30g FOWLR and I have CustomSeaLife 1x96W PC (Smart Lamp). I do not want to go with MH yet, so the VHO would be an option... Please, convince me VHO is better and cheaper than PC ![]() |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Council
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: anaheim, CA
Posts: 347
|
Why do you want to upgrade your lights when you have fish only?
Is it going to be a reef? Anyways, VHO ballasts are not cheap. They sell online from $100-$150. PCs do seem brighter than VHO given that the light is concentrated in a "compact" tube while the VHO's are spread through the length of the tube. However, VHO actinics IMO do a much better job in terms of fluorescence that the PC true actinics. The cheapest alternative for VHOs are probably to use a Workhorse 7 ballast to run 2 VHO tubes (96 Watts each). It cost around $35. For PCs, I tried some HD ballast and they do work but it's actually cost a only a fraction less if you buy it online. But since you are comparing prices for VHO's/PC, I would like to add that you can add a MH for about the same price or a few dollars more. http://oceanencounter.com/Merchant2/...gory_Code=ICMH |
|
|
|