Welcome Guest, Please Login or Register!
Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Support RL
Home Forum Aquarium Log Gallery Sponsors RHO Bookstore

vho lighting

Go Back   Reeflands Forum > Equipment > Lighting
Sponsored Links
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-07-2002, 10:14 AM   #1
Just Moved In
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: philadelphia, pa USA
Posts: 43
vho lighting

How much heat can vho lamps generate? I will be upgrading from NO lights(4). My tank does not have any fans, and it keeps a steady temperature of 80 degrees. Will the change to vho increase the temp to the point that fans are required? Also, what about energy consumption? Any help would be appreciated.

Thanks
allykahn is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

Old 08-07-2002, 12:55 PM   #2
Council
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: NH
Posts: 270
Send a message via AIM to wastedincome420
I'm far from a pro on this subject but I'll try to help you out as much as I can
I think that it will really depend on how far from the water the VHO's are mounted. You most likely will find the temp to rise some above what the NO were. Also do you have any type of ventalation in the hood now?? I would still reccomend the use of atleast one fan to help cool the bulbs down. You can buy cheap fans a Radio shack which is what I have
. HTH
Wastedincome420
wastedincome420 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2002, 01:31 PM   #3
Just Moved In
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: philadelphia, pa USA
Posts: 43
I am going to build a canopy. What would be a good height for the bulbs placement?
allykahn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2002, 02:42 PM   #4
Council
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: NH
Posts: 270
Send a message via AIM to wastedincome420
I have been told that VHO bulbs should be between 3-6" above the water level. I fyou mount them much higher then you will not be getting the full lighting power from them.
I have mine at about 3-4" above the water.
Since your are going to building a new hood for the lights then i would highly reccomend you add a fan or two to the plan.
I also suggest you use URI bulbs as they have "built in" reflectors in the bulbs. And you will want to make sure you "seal" the inside of you your new hood too.
HTH
Mark
wastedincome420 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2002, 12:19 PM   #5
ASH
Sponsor
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Lawrenceville, NJ USA
Posts: 120
From IceCap:
Several comments that I hope don't sound like shameless plugs.

1. If you use an IceCap 660 you can keep your old NO bulbs and boost their output by about 2X.
2. Energy consumption will be about 285-watt with either NO or VHO lamps, but I also recommend URI bulbs.
(replace them, URIs, every two years and use a reflector anyway)
3. Cheap RS fans are what drove me to come out with a non-disposable solution, a quiet fan made for a corrosive environment (so we don't keep throwing away fans into our environment). One would do it as they're variable speed.

Andy
ASH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2002, 03:19 AM   #6
Mayor
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: OU
Posts: 736
The icecap website says you can run URI's for 2 years without replacing the bulbs? I think they lose their sprectrum prior to one full year. I replace mine every year and you can see a noticable change in intensity. Just my .02
SHOG
__________________
BOOMER SOONER!!!!
SomeHairyOldGuy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2002, 01:27 PM   #7
ASH
Sponsor
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Lawrenceville, NJ USA
Posts: 120
From IceCap:
Except for a really cheaply made lamp. fluorescent lamps don't (can't) shift color. Phosphorus doesn't mutate. They do lose output. Older VHO ballasts got a well deserved bad rap as they lost 30% of their output in 6 months, but still consumed the same wattage. We have less than 20% lose in 2 years. Our ballast will run slightly more wattage through an older bulb which also helps compensate for depreciation.

Whenever you change bulbs it will appear much brighter as the bulbs are clean of salt, and you get a 10% fake output for the first 100 hours as they burn in. The rated output on a lamp is always the 'after 100 hours output'. You don't notice the 1% a day lose for the first 7 - 10 days.

Andy
ASH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2002, 08:13 PM   #8
Just Moved In
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Houston
Posts: 10
Question

So you are saying that you can run URI bulbs 2 years without replacement.
Shawn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2002, 10:32 AM   #9
ASH
Sponsor
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Lawrenceville, NJ USA
Posts: 120
From IceCap:
Yes.
Actinics depreciate a little faster, but their PAR output isn't much to begin with and their effect, I believe, is more for us than the corals.

Andy
ASH is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:53 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0 Release Candidate 3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0 ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81