Welcome Guest, Please Login or Register!
Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Support RL
Home Forum Aquarium Log Gallery Sponsors RHO Bookstore

continued QT suggestion

Go Back   Reeflands Forum > Saltwater Aquariums > Marine Fish: Care, Health and Disease Treatment
Sponsored Links
Notices

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-20-2008, 01:16 PM   #1
I'm just a bill
 
bguile's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: York, PA
Posts: 467
continued QT suggestion

Hi Lee,

I have 5 Royal Grammas in a 40G QT that I purchased from the same LFS a few weeks ago. I started a Cupramine treatment after observing flashing and a few white spots on the fish. I completed the 2 week treatment at a .5ppm level as recommended. I then continued to watch them for another two weeks.

On Friday after watching them closely, I captured them all for a final up-close observation before beginning to acclimate and add them to the display tank. I placed them one by one in a specimen cup and examined them under 10x magnifying glass for any seeable parasites. All but one appeared totally clear with no evidence of white trophonts. This is what I was looking for in particular.

The one fish that I did see something strange on only has a single object on it's caudal fin. Even with the magnifying glass, I can't tell if its actually some sort of parasite or frayed skin material. After debate with myself, I decided to not chance it and put all 5 fish back in the QT and restarted Cupramine treatment. Today, (2 days later) I captured the same fish and examined him again. The same "blemish" is there.

Do you think this was the proper thing to do? I'm sure you don't want to carelessly subject fish to copper treatment. Are there other suggestions you'd like to offer? Also, can a fish have an MI trophont on its tail? Could it really get what it needs to continue its life cycle there and even be protected by the fish's outer coating?
__________________
-Bguile

Ever feel like you haven't learned crap after years in the hobby?!
My 210G Build thread
bguile is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2008, 09:40 AM   #2
Moderator - LEE
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: So CA
Posts: 2,156
Re: continued QT suggestion

Thanks for posting.

Usually, a single spot is not any sign of a problem. I have gotten to the point of being able to separate MI from other 'white spots.' But, I don't expect (nor would I want hobbyists to have that much bad experiences) hobbyists to be able to do this.

Normally: After the Cupramine treatment the fish are still held in quarantine 4 more weeks. Remember that it isn't only MI and MV that are the enemy here. A full 6-week quarantine is needed no matter whether or not the fish was treated for any specific problem. Other pathogens or problems may appear during that time. ALSO: After any treatment, you want to allow about 4 more weeks (even if the treatment was at the end of the full 6-week quarantine) to verify that the treatment was successful.

So, after the treatment and continuing on the with the quarantine another 4 weeks you will observe to see if anything else displays. MI will attack anywhere where there is a blood and 'food' source, fins included. I think the most likely situation here is either a small injury or secondary bacteria trying to setup housekeeping or the fish's reaction to either of the above. I would give it time and monitor it (without a magnifying glass).
__________________
LEE

Post your fish care and health questions on the Reefland MARINE FISH: CARE, HEALTH AND DISEASE TREATMENT Forum.
leebca is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2008, 07:27 PM   #3
I'm just a bill
 
bguile's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: York, PA
Posts: 467
Re: continued QT suggestion

Thanks. Call me paranoid, but even after the 4 week observation following the Cupramine treatment I want to make sure that I'm not releasing any known parasites into my main tank. That's really the reason for the magnifying glass.
__________________
-Bguile

Ever feel like you haven't learned crap after years in the hobby?!
My 210G Build thread
bguile is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2008, 09:47 AM   #4
Moderator - LEE
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: So CA
Posts: 2,156
Re: continued QT suggestion

I understand your perspective. I don't think it's paranoia. But the magnifying glass is not definitive -- that is, you won't be able to confirm the absence of many parasites by the use of it. Since it is not a definitive tool, you still want to hold the fish after treatment.
__________________
LEE

Post your fish care and health questions on the Reefland MARINE FISH: CARE, HEALTH AND DISEASE TREATMENT Forum.
leebca is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
MH suggestion? Leddy Lighting 32 10-18-2006 07:41 PM
Stocking my 180... anyone have any fish suggestion fishgeeksrus Reef Aquariums 10 02-03-2004 10:49 PM
R/O Water Suggestion Captain Reef Aquariums 2 12-06-2002 10:54 AM
Live Rock suggestion hinescom Reef Aquariums 1 02-07-2002 09:26 PM
Need a Suggestion ,Please fisherman Reef Aquariums 3 06-18-2001 03:43 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0 Release Candidate 3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0 ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.