Welcome to the Reef Forum.
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 12 of 12
  1. #1
    Council
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Columbia Falls
    Posts
    427
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Considering a Nano

    I'll be in south TX for the next couple years, which as you all know, is too long to go without an aquarium. So I'm considering a nano (shouldn't need much maintenance?)...
    Anybody have one or know where I could make a deal on one? I'm coming home for a week before driving down there...
    Always learnin something new...
    Jase

  2. #2
    VIP Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    cape may nj
    Posts
    1,799
    Images
    5
    Thanks
    15
    Thanked 30 Times in 30 Posts

    Re: Considering a Nano

    nano's are great for those that have had alot of xp in saltwater. they are actually harder to maintain than a larger tank since it doesnt take much for them to go south. i had one for a while and will say that you gotta really be on top of the chemistry and make up water. with the right equipment and alot of attentiveness, it would work out great for you

  3. #3
    Moderator Ninong's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2000
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    24,027
    Images
    3
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked 59 Times in 55 Posts

    Re: Considering a Nano

    As far as maintenance is concerned, it's pretty much the same regardless of the size of the tank. It just means that the amount of water you need for a water change is smaller and you have less glass to clean.

    Evaporation will have to be topped off almost daily if you want to avoid spikes in salinity. If you're not running a skimmer, you should probably do weekly water changes of about 15-20%. So water changes are more frequent the smaller the size of the aquarium.

    One good thing about small tanks is that you can use the two-part calcium-alkalinity products to maintain calcium and alkalinity. They would be too expensive if you had a large tank.

    Lighting will depend on what you intend to keep. The light requirements of corals is the same regardless of the size of the aquarium. The only thing that matters is the quality/intensity of the light that strikes the surface of the coral, not the volume of water. Obviously the distance between the coral and the light source is important but it's exactly the same consideration as it would be in a large tank. Eight inches below a light of x-intensity is the same whether it's in a 20-gal tank or a 200-gal tank. The corals don't know the size of the aquarium, nor do they care. There is a false assumption on the part of many people that they can run say a 20-gal aquarium with just a couple of fluorescent tubes because, after all, it's x number of "watts per gallon." "Watts per gallon" is totally irrelevant.

    So lighting a nano tank can be trickly. Trying to get adequate light without boiling the water can be a problem, depending on what you want to keep. That's why so many advanced aquarists who keep nano tanks use 70w or 150w metal halides over their nano tanks. A single 150w 50,000K medium base Iwasaki lamp is perfect all by itself for say a 20-gal nano tank. Don't let the 50,000K rating fool you. Its appearance is more like other 14,000K or 20,000K lamps. In fact, it's not as blue as most 14,000K and 20,000K lamps. And you don't have to worry about running actinics with it.

    Don't think that setting up a nano tank will be really cheap, because it won't if you do it right.

    Anyway, good luck with your nano tank. Just remember, you won't be able to be away from it for more than about 48 hours at the most. Unless you have auto top-off.
    Ninong

  4. #4
    Council
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Columbia Falls
    Posts
    427
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Re: Considering a Nano

    Great points. Most of which, I have been told. I guess what I meant by less maintenance was smaller maintenance... Haha.
    I was hoping someone in the club would have a setup they weren't using, but if I need to build it myself, that will be alright.
    My only major question is on the lighting recommended. I'm pretty big on t5 and was thinking that's the route I would go. Wouldn't 150w 50000k mh be a bit excessive? Or boil the water? Haha.
    Also, I will probably go sps or lps. I don't want to "manage" any softies. That gets old quick.
    Last edited by CutthroatKid; 08-19-2010 at 08:18 AM.
    Always learnin something new...
    Jase

  5. #5
    Keeper of Willis charlie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    NW Montana
    Posts
    11,684
    Images
    849
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 22 Times in 21 Posts

    Re: Considering a Nano

    My personal feeling would be that T5 would be good for you. Some of the all in one nanos are pretty nice looking. You may want to get in touch with Michael over in Spokane, he can fill you in as to what he did with Angie's nano.
    400 Gallon Reef Log
    Rome wasn't built in a day---neither is a reef

    Willis--1998-2009---I will miss you.

  6. #6
    Governor Parrothead's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Jacksonville, Florida
    Posts
    4,296
    Images
    3
    Thanks
    53
    Thanked 50 Times in 50 Posts

    Re: Considering a Nano

    I agree with Charlie, there are some really nice nano all in ones out there, from experience look into the bigger ones, I had a 14 and there is just so much you can do with something that size.
    Tanks,
    Robert


    "a Reef tank is like a garden, you grow one, not buy one"

  7. #7
    Council
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Columbia Falls
    Posts
    427
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Re: Considering a Nano

    Alright. I forgot they had one. I do want one in that 20 gallon range, but don't intend to do too much. Just a couple fish and a few coals.
    Always learnin something new...
    Jase

  8. #8
    Moderator Ninong's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2000
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    24,027
    Images
    3
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked 59 Times in 55 Posts

    Re: Considering a Nano

    A 20-gal nano tank can be lit with T5s. It can also be lit with a single 150w metal halide, such as the 150w Iwasaki 50,000K medium base lamp. It's all just a matter of positioning your light(s) at the proper distance above the water's surface.

    Looks like Iwasaki is now making the 50,000K in a 150w DE version, too, but I've never seen tests or photos of tanks lit with that one yet. Dana Riddle did a review of the medium base Iwasaki 150w 50,000K lamp several years back when it first came out and he included side by side pics of a 20-gal reef tank lit with it vs. other options. Obviously a 50,000K lamp is not nearly as strong as a 10,000K lamp of the same wattage when it comes to both light intensity or PAR but it's great for smaller tanks as a stand-alone light.
    Ninong

  9. #9
    Keeper of Willis charlie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    NW Montana
    Posts
    11,684
    Images
    849
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 22 Times in 21 Posts

    Re: Considering a Nano

    Quote Originally Posted by CutthroatKid View Post
    Alright. I forgot they had one. I do want one in that 20 gallon range, but don't intend to do too much. Just a couple fish and a few coals.
    You will be fine with whatever you choose, and you know it.
    400 Gallon Reef Log
    Rome wasn't built in a day---neither is a reef

    Willis--1998-2009---I will miss you.

  10. #10
    Council
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Columbia Falls
    Posts
    427
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Re: Considering a Nano

    That was mighty inspiring, Charlie. ;)
    I suppose If nobody has anything here, I'll just try to find one down there. I'll surely let you folks know what I do. I will probably stick with T5 just for financial reasons, but haven't completely put off MH if I find the right price.
    The input helps a lot, thanks guys.
    Always learnin something new...
    Jase

  11. #11
    Keeper of Willis charlie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    NW Montana
    Posts
    11,684
    Images
    849
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 22 Times in 21 Posts

    Re: Considering a Nano

    Maybe give Kevin a jingle, he always seems to know someone that is breaking something down. Stick with the T5's, you know what they are capable of.
    400 Gallon Reef Log
    Rome wasn't built in a day---neither is a reef

    Willis--1998-2009---I will miss you.

  12. #12
    Mayor
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Spokane, WA
    Posts
    537
    Images
    3
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Re: Considering a Nano

    I agree with most of what's been said! However, you will probably run into issues, depending on the size of Nano you get, with T5 lighting. Unfortunately, there's only 1 manufacturer that makes a 20" T5 fixture and it SUCKS!! It's not so much that the fixture sucks, because you can change out the ballast, for a better ballast. However, this is also the only company that makes 20" bulbs, and their bulbs DO SUCK!!

    So, if you do decide to get into a Nano, while T5 lighting IS the way to go, you'll have to either find a 24" wide tank, or let your 24" fixture hang over, 2" on each side, since the most common AIO Nanos are 20" wide.

    Angie's nano is a 24 gallon Aquapod, with a 150MH Sunpod fixture over it. Unfortunately, Corallife, who makes the Aquapod and the Sunpod, has discontinued those, so you'll have to find a used one, if you decide to go that route. To be honest, I've been looking for a way to change out the lighting, to T5s, but so far, haven't found an option I'm happy with, yet.


 

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Aquapod nano cube or JBJ nano cube?
    By weez1959 in forum Reef Aquariums
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 08-15-2007, 08:51 PM
  2. 13w on nano
    By Reefer769 in forum Lighting
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-03-2004, 10:55 AM
  3. nano nano nano
    By Rp Marine in forum Saltwater (Fish-Only) Aquariums
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 12-22-2003, 11:17 PM
  4. Hello new here, pic of my nano
    By reefrunner69 in forum Reef Aquariums
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 10-15-2003, 04:03 PM
  5. SPS Nano
    By bugSy in forum Reef Aquariums
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 08-18-2001, 08:16 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107