Welcome to the Reef Forum.
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1
    Council fishgeeksrus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    381
    Images
    13
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    250W MH vs 400W MH?????

    We are debating between 250w vs 400w. We are going to have a majority of sps corals. We also may want a few soft corals. Should we put 250's or 400's?
    Attached Images  

  2. #2
    Admin zhenya's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    new jersey,usa
    Posts
    8,795
    Images
    1846
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 27 Times in 25 Posts
    If I remember correctly,you are setting up a 180g.Right?
    I'm not sure what wattage you'd like better but here's a link to Joe Burger's(JB NY) site, he has the same size tank and you can see how it looks with 3x250W bulbs.
    http://www.cnidarianreef.com/

    400 watters are nice but they heat up a tank in a heart beat,IMO.
    Kind regards,

    Gene.

    Images from my previous tank http://s264.photobucket.com/albums/i...on%20reeftank/

  3. #3
    Council fishgeeksrus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    381
    Images
    13
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Thanks I will check that out

  4. #4
    Moderator Poseidon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Swartz Creek, MI
    Posts
    6,793
    Images
    450
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Personally I'd go with the 250's as well. Unless you plan on putting SPS WAY DOWN ON THE SAND, you will just be paying more on the electric bill!!!
    Need a Photographer?

    Just say NO to CRABS

    Mike

  5. #5
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Feb 2000
    Location
    Bardstown, KY
    Posts
    13,760
    Images
    51
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
    I agree, I think the 250w bulbs will be plenty and will not over heat your tank; the 400w bulbs may require you to get a chiller.

    Scott Z.

  6. #6
    Council fishgeeksrus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    381
    Images
    13
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Thanks for suggestions. I guess what made me question this was... I have noticed that a lot of the web sites that are selling frags are using 400w with shallow vats. The colors are unbelievable on some of these corals. I though maybe the 400w makes for more brilliant colors.

    Scott, I will have to get a chiller anyway. The canopy that we built is enclosed and the tank is in a smaller room.
    Attached Images  

  7. #7
    Admin zhenya's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    new jersey,usa
    Posts
    8,795
    Images
    1846
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 27 Times in 25 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by fishgeeksrus
    Thanks for suggestions. I guess what made me question this was... I have noticed that a lot of the web sites that are selling frags are using 400w with shallow vats. The colors are unbelievable on some of these corals. I though maybe the 400w makes for more brilliant colors.

    Scott, I will have to get a chiller anyway. The canopy that we built is enclosed and the tank is in a smaller room.
    If you are getting the chiller and set on buying those frags that you had seen under 400 watters I would just go ahead and go with the same lighting then.
    Makes acclimating frags much easier,IMO. If you will be getting some softies,I'd make sure to check if they will not cause any problems for your stonies with allelopathic activities. Some of them are just down right nasty and pack a wallop as far as toxins are concern. Something to think about ;)

    As far as heat concerns and size of the room.., I have my 75g tank presently in a small room that I use as a office space(about 12x14) that has one window.This tank is lit with two 250w MH and I have an open tank and my canopy is elevated from the tank,the room heats up like mad with one fan blowing hot air from that canopy and open window. I can't set up my chiller eventhough I have one becouse it will heat up the room even more.Just another thing to consider
    Kind regards,

    Gene.

    Images from my previous tank http://s264.photobucket.com/albums/i...on%20reeftank/

  8. #8
    Council
    Join Date
    Jul 2000
    Location
    Cherry Hill, NJ
    Posts
    484
    Images
    117
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Don't forget that a propagation facility is going for maximum growth in addition to optimal coloration, which may cause them to choose 400w lighting over 250s. You probably won't have the need to maximize growth.

    I found the "Ultimate Marine Aquariums" book to be useful in making lighting decisions; lots of good photos and a complete listing of equipment for each featured tank. There were plenty of superb examples of tanks lit with 250w DE bulbs.

  9. #9
    Moderator Ninong's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2000
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    24,027
    Images
    3
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked 59 Times in 55 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by fishgeeksrus
    Thanks for suggestions. I guess what made me question this was... I have noticed that a lot of the web sites that are selling frags are using 400w with shallow vats. The colors are unbelievable on some of these corals. I though maybe the 400w makes for more brilliant colors.

    Scott, I will have to get a chiller anyway. The canopy that we built is enclosed and the tank is in a smaller room.
    You have to draw the line somewhere. Just because one coral specimen is more colorful than another one doesn't necessarily mean it is healthier. It is just prettier in our eyes.

    If you want to go to the extreme, you can get some extremely colorful SPS like this guy: http://ghchhilojack.homestead.com/Acropora.html See how pretty his corals are? Aren't they EXTREMELY colorful? They should be. He's running 2,350 watts over a 57-gal corner tank (one 1,000w, three 400w and two 75w VHO actinics).

    I'm running 250w 10,000K HQI DE lamps because they use less electricity than 400w lamps while producing more PAR than some 400w lamps and almost as much PAR as the best 400w lamps. I wouldn't mind running 1,000w lamps myself if I had a really large tank, an unlimited budget and a way to deal with the heat.

    I think your "best buy" for tanks less than 30" high are 250w 10,000K HQI DE lamps.
    Ninong

  10. #10
    Council fishgeeksrus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    381
    Images
    13
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    I think we are just going to go with the 250w mh's. Maybe if we want to go a little more extreme in the future, we will consider upgrading. Now we are just waiting for them to come in. Then next item is probably the chiller.


 

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. WTB a triple 400w MH setup!!
    By ChaoticReefer in forum For Sale or Trade Zone
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 12-17-2004, 06:36 PM
  2. 3 MH 250w retros for sale, Chicago
    By billzie in forum For Sale or Trade Zone
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-08-2002, 05:28 PM
  3. WTB used 400w 10K MH bulbs
    By Reefmaiden in forum For Sale or Trade Zone
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 02-22-2002, 10:44 AM
  4. 250W Iwasaki on an HQI Ballast?
    By MtnDewMan in forum Lighting
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-21-2001, 05:10 PM
  5. Decision with 250W or 400W Iwasaki
    By Ermin in forum Lighting
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 05-09-2001, 09:53 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107