|

|
What Species Is This Clam? (Photo) |
|
||||||
|
|
#1 |
|
Mayor
Join Date: May 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 941
|
I was told that this clam is a T.derasa. However, I thought derasa clams had a smoother shell. Is this a derasa, crocea or maxima?
![]() |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Alta Loma,Ca
Posts: 2,943
|
I have never seen a Derasa that color.......It looks like a Crocea to me
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Governor
|
Its a Crocea!
And a very pretty one 2!!! Enjoy, Joe |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wichita, Kansas
Posts: 5,316
|
I would say that its a crocea too probably. But I have seen pics from your tank Reinhold and they have a nice pinkish tint and Im wandering what this clam looks like under say 6500k pure bulbs I am assuming that you have a good supplemnt of Actinic to see the clam with a pure white light and from above would tell exactly what it is IMO.
![]() Shes a beauty whatever species she is though ![]()
__________________
Rocky
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Mayor
Join Date: May 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 941
|
Good point, scubadude.
Here is a shot without the actinics, (03 actinic, 2 X 55W PC's from lampsnow.com.)
I could not get the stupid Killer Hawkfish to move, as almost everytime he sees the camera, he comes and sits down in front of it. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wichita, Kansas
Posts: 5,316
|
Now I hink it looks like a Maxima
Im not sure though Love the hawkfish 2 ![]()
__________________
Rocky
Last edited by scubadude; 07-28-2001 at 07:26 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Governor
|
its all in the ridges, not the color
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 20,692
|
I am inclined to believe that it could be a T. derasa. You could erase all doubt very quickly by looking at the byssal orifice. Derasa would have a narrow byssal orifice, whereas crocea would have a wide byssal orifice. In fact, crocea has the largest byssal orifice relative to the size of the shell. A derasa shell usually has six vertical folds and is symmetrical. A crocea shell usually does not exhibit vertical folds and instead the lower half is relatively smooth and free of folds. A maxima would have an asymmetrical elongated shell.
Ninong ![]()
__________________
Ninong |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Alta Loma,Ca
Posts: 2,943
|
Now it looks a little more natural. It still looks like a Crocea
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Mayor
Join Date: May 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 941
|
Thanks everyone.
I count 6 vertical grooves, and the shell halves are very symmetrical, allowing the clam to close completely. The byssal orifice on this 2 1/2 inch clam measured about 1/4 inch across. It is now stuck down to the rock by the gland or whatever it is at the orifice. Based on what Ninong said, it probably is a derasa. Good for me, since I have PC lights and not metal halides. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Just Moved In
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: burnaby,bc,canada
Posts: 23
|
Nope, it's most likely a crocea. deresa's have a distinct look to them. just do a search and look at a few pics, you'll see what i mean. and the maxima's have more pronounced scutes.
well i'll tell you this forsure, if you paid derasa prices for it, you got a deal!! i'm not gonna bash you and say you need halides for it, just keep it in the upper half of the tank. BTW, it is a very nice clam! enjoy. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Mayor
Join Date: May 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 941
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Alta Loma,Ca
Posts: 2,943
|
Yeah, I kept a Crocea under 4x55 watt PC's in my old 55 for a long time. It was way up high. I some how introduced something to my old tank that killed all my clams......here's a picture of it.
Like Tom said "most Deresa's I have seen including mine have smooth shells with no scutes showing" ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Alta Loma,Ca
Posts: 2,943
|
Here's an old pic of my Derasa.....
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Mayor
Join Date: May 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 941
|
Golfish:
The clam I have sure looks alot like your crocea. The shell doesn't look anything like the derasa pic you posted. I will eventually add a metal halide hood to my tank, but in the meantime, it's about halfway up in my 60 stuck on a rock shelf. I hope it's okay there. The actinics are 2 X 55W and the whites are 2 X 65W 8800 K. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 20,692
|
If your clam is a T. crocea, this is what the byssal orifice would look like:
![]() T. crocea has the largest byssal orifice relative to the size of the shell of all the Tridacnids. T. derasa has a narrow gap for a byssal orifice. Ninong ![]()
__________________
Ninong |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Mayor
Join Date: May 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 941
|
Ninong
The byssal orifice was only about 1/4 inch across and was actually a little off center instead of centered, like the photo. It is pretty well stuck down on the rock now, so I can't take a photo of it. It seems happy where it is, but I sure am confused. |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 20,692
|
The shell of your clam seems to me to be similar to these derasa shells.
![]() Ninong ![]()
__________________
Ninong |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Citizen
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 157
|
It's a crocea. I don't think there's really that much doubt.
You say the bysall opening is only 1/4 inch, but you are measuring it while occupied. That pic that was shown was of a dead clam with no tissue to help cover up the actual opening. Your clam isn a crocea. JP
__________________
http://fyrman.homestead.com/welcome.html |
|
|
|