Welcome Guest, Please Login or Register!
Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Support RL
Home Forum Aquarium Log Gallery Sponsors RHO Bookstore

which comes first,the fish or the corals?

Go Back   Reeflands Forum > Saltwater Aquariums > Reef Aquariums
Sponsored Links
View Poll Results: which comes first?
fish 48 85.71%
corals 8 14.29%
Voters: 56. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-01-2003, 01:02 PM   #1
Governor
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Northern CA
Posts: 2,171
which comes first,the fish or the corals?

i think most people add fish before they start adding corals-and i feel that is fine-but ime adding alot of hardy corals right after the cycle is most definitely the way to go.

think about it-corals are consumers of nitrogen ,they improve water quality-much as plants do in a freshwater setup.so if you stocked youre tank with a bunch of softies/hardy stonies in the beginning-you would probably be able to handle much more delicate fish quicker-right?
not to mention that the corals would be directly competing with "problem" algea for both light an nutrients.

so, what do you think?
organicreefer is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

Old 02-01-2003, 03:44 PM   #2
Governor
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Northern CA
Posts: 2,171
8 votes and no comments?c'mon lets hear why fish/corals first.
organicreefer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2003, 05:03 PM   #3
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Spokane Valley WA
Posts: 2,438
Fish have no problem doing well in a imature tank but corals and anemones do.

Regards,
Kevin
__________________
SPSguy
On - On
kevinpo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2003, 05:51 PM   #4
Owner
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Bardstown, KY
Posts: 13,047
I'm voting for fish here. Typically fish can handle a higher level of nitrates in the aquarium and since nitrate is the last piece of the cycle and most people are ready to add something to their tank after 4 weeks of looking at rock, I just believe a hearty fish is a safer bet.

Regards,
__________________
Scott Z.
75 Gallon Reef Log
Powered by Reefland's Personal Online Aquarium Log
Reefland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2003, 09:05 PM   #5
Governor
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Northern CA
Posts: 2,171
only one other vote for corals so far other than me?surely there must be more of us

i still feel that hardy corals do just as well in a new setup as any fish-and they would help prevent the accumulation of nitrate.

ever notice people with alot of corals usually dont have problems with algea-its always (or mostly it seems to me)those half stocked around 1 year old tanks .there is absolutely no need to be so cautious in adding corals and you can easily fill up a tank in a couple months without doing any harm.

for example -you can add say ten corals to a 50 gallon tank in a day without trouble -but doing the same with fish could be a roll of the dice..............
organicreefer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2003, 07:47 AM   #6
Mayor
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: OU
Posts: 736
My .02
I think it would depend on if the person has any experiance with saltwater. I know when I got into saltwater it was because of the fish. Corals came later. And I couldnt hardly wait to add a fish. Still today I would much rather throw in a 2 dollar damsel to finish the cycle than a coral.
SHOG
__________________
BOOMER SOONER!!!!

Last edited by SomeHairyOldGuy; 02-03-2003 at 09:54 AM.
SomeHairyOldGuy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2003, 08:06 PM   #7
Governor
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: tempe,AZ
Posts: 1,114
I have always been to add fish first and the tank settle in for a few months before adding corals so its a more stable enviroment but
organicreefer has a very good point.
When I setup my next tank in a few weeks I will add both fish and a few leather corals at the same time.
So add on to the poll
add both at same time.
tendar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2003, 12:57 PM   #8
Polymath
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Cherry Hill, NJ
Posts: 526
Send a message via AIM to Penguin
Isn't that the approach advocated by GARF?
__________________
As a nation, you're faced with the choice of taking over the world or offering good eats at reasonable prices.
Penguin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2003, 01:22 PM   #9
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Alta Loma,Ca
Posts: 2,943
Quote:
Originally posted by Penguin
Isn't that the approach advocated by GARF?
Come on now, lets no use 4 letter words
golfish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2003, 01:28 PM   #10
Polymath
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Cherry Hill, NJ
Posts: 526
Send a message via AIM to Penguin
Quote:
Come on now, lets no use 4 letter words
Whoops, it must have just slipped out.
__________________
As a nation, you're faced with the choice of taking over the world or offering good eats at reasonable prices.
Penguin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2003, 05:57 PM   #11
Governor
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Northern CA
Posts: 2,171
garf advocates filling the tank up with corals quickly??i didnt know that -they must be smarter than i thought

seriously though-by waiting on fish and adding corals first you would allow the microfauna to build up as well.

its the way of the future i tell ya




organicreefer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2003, 04:47 AM   #12
Moderator
 
scubadude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wichita, Kansas
Posts: 5,301
I can see the relavancy (sp?) here and I know that corals can tax a tank w/ a bioload too but the bioload of the fish always seemed more important. As Scott mentioned they for the most part will tolerate more nitrates too.
scubadude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2003, 12:44 PM   #13
Governor
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Northern CA
Posts: 2,171
id like to hear from the other people that voted corals-have you done it ?do you consider it a success(obviously you do).

nitrates wont build up in a tank with lots of coral and no fish-after the cycle is done youll get a small spike and that should go away with water changes and then the sand/rocks will start to eat em too.

it really doesnt take more than a couple months to stabilize nitates at 0 ime.

i used to stock my tanks real slow-but about 8 months ago i was thinking of this whole theory and did it -practically filled up the tank in a couple months-and things have never been better or more stable since.

algea simply doesnt have the bare rock to grow on/or the nutrients to fuel it it seems.
organicreefer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2003, 05:12 AM   #14
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Forney Texas USA
Posts: 2,277
Smile

Hi All,

I suppose my approach on this issue has gone back and forth over the years.

Now that I am setting up my systems with DSBs and Macro-algae filters, I guess that I spend some time building up the sand bed/refugium fauna and don’t add corals or fish until the nitrate is already gone.

However at this point, I can/do start adding fish and/or corals. It doesn’t really matter which.

Regards,

Scott
__________________
Founding Member – Rocky Mountain Reef Club

You can see my former reeftank at http://www.sdpasse.com
SPasse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2003, 12:45 PM   #15
Just Moved In
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Stockbridge, GA
Posts: 25
Send a message via AIM to Wrassman Send a message via Yahoo to Wrassman
Cool

I got into this hobby a long time ago because of the fish. I've kept a few corals only tanks over the years, but they just don't hold the same place in my heart that a tank with fish in it does.

No, I pick out my fish first, then I pick corals to go with them. It makes for some pretty interesting tanks.
__________________
58g Reef Tank, 20g Sump/Refugium, 85lbs LR, 4" DSB, AquaMedic Turbofloater 1000 multi, Eheim 2213

Wrassman
www.threestepstoareefaquarium.com
Wrassman is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:56 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0 Release Candidate 3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0 ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79