Lighting is always a subjective question. What sounds "right" to one person may sound inadequate to others. It is possible to use 250w metal halide lamps over a 36" tall reef aquarium but most people would opt for 400w -- some might even consider 1000w but they would be the exception. Michael Moye (64Ivy) uses 250w metal halides over his 539-gallon, 36" tall reef tank.Originally Posted by swmccon
When you say that the new tank will have a "side overflow," do you mean that it will have the overflow on just one side or both sides? The only reason this relates to lighting is that it affects the available area that needs to be illuminated. Another factor to take into consideration is the location of the acrylic cross braces on the top of the tank. You should try to have each metal halide lamp over an opening in the top of the tank so that none of the metal halide lamps is directly above an acrylic brace.
It is not possible to adequately light a tank that is 36" front-to-back with just one row of 250w metal halide lamps, even if you use parallel reflectors rather than the usual perpendicular reflectors, your coverage will be incomplete. But this is another of those subjective judgments. Some folks may be satisfied with that arrangement, especially if the tank is viewable on both long sides, which yours won't be. The reason for that is that a tank that is viewable on both long sides would have about 6" of open space in front of the rock structure on both sides so that only about 24" in the middle would be critical when it comes to lighting. That sort of arrangement with adequate fluorescent actinic supplementation would suffice for that sort of a tank.
If I were trying to light a tank such as you described and I wanted to utilize my existing lighting, I might consider adding three 400w metal halides lamps in addition to the existing two 250w halides. Again, my choices would change depending on the configuration of the top of the acrylic tank. Personally, I like the appearance of a combination of 10,000K and 20,000K halides with a good deal of actinic supplementation -- either VHO or T5.
It's really a matter of personal preferences and whatever you choose will work for you if you select your tank's inhabitants and their placement in accordance with your lighting restrictions.
There are several good brands to choose from. Most hobbyists are going with closed loops or Tunze Streams to provide supplemental current in addition to the flow through the sump. It is difficult to manage more than about 2,000 gph through most reasonably sized sumps but you can double or triple that total flow by adding closed loops or Tunze Streams. You might consider something that would give you a minimum of 1500 gph through the sump and then add a closed loop that would give you another 3000 gph or use four Tunze Streams instead of a closed loop.2) what size pump will I need for all this? the vertical lift will be about 6' max.
The old 120-gal would make a nice refugium for a 430-gal tank or you could set it aside as a quarantine tank or a coral propagation tank. It is certainly not "too big" for a refugium. Some people have refugia that are just as large as their main display tank.3) Any ideas on how the 120g can be used in this configuration. Is it too big for a refugium?
Just be sure that you are getting "tropical play sand" and not regular play sand. IMO the aragonite play sand is much, much nicer for a reef aquarium. However, a word of caution is in order at this point. Using fine particle aragonite sand may restrict your options when it comes to choosing your total water flow package. It can be done but it can be tricky. Kevinpo is using a DSB of fine particle aragonite sand in his 550-gal reef aquarium with fairly strong water current but some people who have opted for extreme water current have gone with either a bare bottom (64Ivy) or a larger particle DSB (Wayne Shang). I'm not trying to discourage you from choosing a fine particle DSB but I just want to point out that this is an area that has to be considered carefully in advance because of its impact on your total water current equipment and its placement.4) I have read about using play sand as a base and then live sand on top. Seems like a reasonable option since I'll be taking down the 120g and will have lots of live sand (and rock) available from it.
Kevinpo: http://www.reefland.com/gallery/show...r=2049&cat=500
64Ivy: http://www.reefland.com/feature504.php
Steve Weast: http://www.oregonreef.com/sub_gallery.htm
Wayne Shang: http://www.underseadiscovery.com/gadget2.htm (Check out his two Korallin C-10002 calcium reactors!)
Do not add any live sand until you finish cycling the new live rock and new dead sand. Since you intend moving your existing live rock and live sand into the new aquarium, there is no need for you to purchase any live sand at this point. DO NOT attempt to move the entire sand bed from the old tank to the new tank. This is never a wise choice. It is MUCH safer to simply utilize the top 3/4" - 1" layer of the existing sand bed and discard the rest.5) I've been thinking through the actual move from the 120g to the 430g. I want to use the sand, the rock, and the inhabitants as I move. My thoughts are to:
a) set up the new tank
b) add new live rock and playsand (perhaps some live sand)
c) let the tank cycle with the new rock
d) move the sand and lr from the 120g to the new tank
e) move the creatures and coral
Another way to do this would be to cycle the new live rock in the new tank without any sand bed at all. Then add the sand after the rock is fully cured. Or you could go with fully cured live rock from the start. The advantage to using fully cured live rock is that you could set up the new tank all at once without having to do this more than once. In this scenario you would add your new dead sand bed, then add your live rock (both the new fully cured live rock and the live rock from the 120-gal tank), then add enough live sand from the top layer of your 120-gal tank to get things off to a good start. This can be done safely if the new live rock is really fully cured. You could always leave the corals and fish with some of the live rock in the 120-gal tank for the first 24 hours or so to make sure that the water in the new tank is OK. There will be very little, if any, ammonia spike if you use fully cured live rock and some of the existing water and live rock from the old tank. This is really not much different than moving from one tank to another.
If you want to be super safe, just put the dead sand plus some of the live sand from the old tank into the new tank with some of the live rock from the old tank and check the water parameters for 48 hours before adding the rest of the live rock from the old tank and the livestock from the old tank. Then discard the rest of the substrate in the old tank and clean it out. Now use the old 120-gal tank to cure your new live rock if it is not fully cured before adding it to the new tank.
The thing you want to avoid, if possible, is having to add sand (of any kind) after the new tank is up and running. This is always a messy experience.
The SeaClone skimmer is of no use whatsoever. You will need a good quality skimmer that is adequate for your new system. There are several possibilities but you do not want to skimp in this area. The Korallin 1501 is totally inadequate for your new system but it might be possible to add a second chamber or another calcium reactor in sequence with the 1501. I would probably sell the 1501 and start off with something larger. Look at the two 42" tall Korallin calcium reactors Wayne is using: http://www.underseadiscovery.com/gadget2.htm6) I know I'll need a larger skimmer and calc reactor. Are the smaller versions of any use (Skimmer is a seaclone, calc is a single chamber Korralin c1501)?
Yes! Lots and lots of other questions. Take your time and research this setup in advance. You may want to spend at least two or three months going over the possibilities. Hopefully you already realize the probable expense involved and that won't be an issue.Any other questions I should be asking?
![]()



LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote



Bookmarks