|

|
New 265 gallon Perfecto |
|
||||||
|
|
#61 |
|
Governor
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Clearwater, FL
Posts: 1,234
|
It is effective against bacteria and algae spores... that's why I'm putting it on my system... but it only reduces the bacteria, algae spores and some free-swimming paracites... it does not irradicate them from the tank.
__________________
Bubba Hmmm... now that the tank is full, I could convert the pool to saltwater... Bubba's Aquarium Log |
|
|
|
|
|
#62 |
|
Moderator
|
Ahhh I see. I think it is a good idea, I am planning on adding it to my system.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#63 | |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 20,364
|
Quote:
This is one of those areas where it doesn't pay to go cheapy. Some UV lamps are better than others. I think a good 57w lamp would have been a good choice for your size tank but a good 40w would be adequate. The 57w size would allow you to turn over the tank volume five times per hour without compromising the dosage. With a 36w lamp, you're going to have to reduce the flow rate to about 400gph to achieve adequate dosage, even for a good, efficient lamp. The argument against using UV lamps doesn't have much to do with whether they can be effective or not, it has more to do with the fact that properly sized they can be very effective. In other words, they kill everything that passes through them -- the good, the bad and the merely ugly. Some people choose to avoid them for that very reason. On the other hand, they are quite popular with hobbyists running very expensive mega-reeftanks because they add an extra measure of safety in that they greatly reduce the probability of parasitic infestation or even things like RTN. It's all a matter of weighing the pros and the cons to determine if a UV is something you want to go with. I can see good arguments on both sides but I now think that they are a wise investment for anyone setting up a fairly large SPS-dominated reef aquarium. I think it's a good idea for your 265-gal tank but I think you would have been better off going for a better, more expensive model. I like the 57w UltraViolet models, with wiper, because they're shorter than the standard 40w models and they give you 17 more watts. UltraViolet has a nice sizing chart on their website (that I've posted in previous threads on Reefland). Note that the dosage listed refers to EOL (end of life) measurements. They use 14 months as EOL for their lamps. Dosage at beginning of lamp life is much higher. (P.S. -- Comparing UV lamps of the same wattage is about as useful (or useless) as comparing metal halide lamps of the same wattage -- some 175w metal halide lamps are three times as effective as other 175w metal halide lamps by actual PAR measurement.) P.S. -- Steve Weast runs a 200w AquaUltraViolet UV lamp on his tank: ![]()
__________________
Ninong |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#64 |
|
Governor
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Clearwater, FL
Posts: 1,234
|
I've got an Aqua UV with a wiper on my 75. The problem with the wiper is that calcium precipitates on the wiper rod, in addition to the quartz, and when you pull the rod in and out to wipe the quartz, the calcium on the rod wears the rubber seal down causing leaking around the rod after a while. I've had to replace the wiper rod seal twice in the last 8 months. It would work great for wiping slime off the quartz, but not calcium (which builds up on the quartz due to the heat of the light anyway). I was thinking of the Aqua UV unit without a wiper rod for the 75, but I went with the other and saved more than just a few bucks. I did it knowing it wasn't the most efficient killing unit.
The other problem with using a UV on a recirculating system (instead of single pass sterilization) is like the old math problem... "If you take half of something, then take half of what is left, then keep taking a half of what is left over and over, how long until you get it all? Never." (it's the ole calculus limit thingy). Even with a 100% kill rate, espcically since the bugs are still breeding, you may never irradicate the population.
__________________
Bubba Hmmm... now that the tank is full, I could convert the pool to saltwater... Bubba's Aquarium Log Last edited by BubbaWPB; 02-20-2006 at 12:37 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#65 | |
|
Governor
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Clearwater, FL
Posts: 1,234
|
Quote:
I'm planning on adding ozone when the tank is finished cycling and running well. That also helps with the "sterilization".
__________________
Bubba Hmmm... now that the tank is full, I could convert the pool to saltwater... Bubba's Aquarium Log |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#66 |
|
Governor
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Clearwater, FL
Posts: 1,234
|
Bulkhead question re: silicone sealant
OK. I've read the directions and even seen it printed in the latest volume of Delbeek and Sprung about bulkheads... you put the o-ring on the side of the glass with the water, and be sure not to over-tighten. Fine.
Now for the questions: 1. Why does everyone I know use silicone sealant on the bulkheads? (When the directions don't mention it.) 2. Are there any disadvantages of using the silicone sealant? 2. When using the silicone sealant (aquarium grade, of course), do you use the silicone o-ring, too? Do you goop it up on both sides of the o-ring? Do you silicone goop the outside seal, too? The ever curious, Bubba ![]()
__________________
Bubba Hmmm... now that the tank is full, I could convert the pool to saltwater... Bubba's Aquarium Log |
|
|
|
|
|
#67 | |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 20,364
|
Quote:
I have a 40w AquaUltraViolet unit (without wiper) that I bought five years ago as a clarifier for a pond that has never been built. One thing led to another and the pond project has just been on hold forever. We don't want to build it now because we're probably going to be selling this house within the next two years anyway.
__________________
Ninong |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#68 | |||||
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 20,364
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
People on here are going to tell you it's a good idea to use silicone. Some people may even tell you to put it on the o-ring. I'm just not one of those people. ![]() P.S. -- My next tank (the dream tank) is going to have schedule 80 bulkheads! You can only do this if the tank is custom built because the bulkhead holes have to be slightly larger than for standard schedule 40 fittings and none of the manufacturers go that route on their stock tanks.
__________________
Ninong |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
#69 |
|
Governor
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Clearwater, FL
Posts: 1,234
|
Thanks again, Ninong, I always appreciate you sharing your knowledge and experience. I now know how to do it right (if I decide to do it).
Still got time for others to add input. Now, one of the major items: The protein skimmer. I've narrowed it down to Tunze DOC Skimmer 9015 or Barr Aquatics SK1620. Any thoughts? Did I miss any other real good in-sump models that are comparable.? I am planning on adding an ozonizer later, and I'm wondering if I can safely add it through one of these units, or should I get a less expensive one especially for ozone (that will allegedly wear out sooner due to the ozone)?
__________________
Bubba Hmmm... now that the tank is full, I could convert the pool to saltwater... Bubba's Aquarium Log |
|
|
|
|
|
#70 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 20,364
|
I'll pass on the skimmer recommendations for that size tank. I'm sure you'll get opinions from others who are running tanks close to that size. All of my research has been concentrated on skimmers for tanks in the 400-500 gallon range because that's what I expect my next tank to be.
![]()
__________________
Ninong |
|
|
|
|
|
#71 |
|
Governor
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Clearwater, FL
Posts: 1,234
|
I hope it doesn't take you as long to get your new tank as it did for your pond!
![]()
__________________
Bubba Hmmm... now that the tank is full, I could convert the pool to saltwater... Bubba's Aquarium Log |
|
|
|
|
|
#72 | |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 20,364
|
Quote:
My last eye surgery on my so-called "good" eye was last August.We didn't start the pond because of my eye problems and now we probably won't set up the pond because we may not stay here more than another year or two.
__________________
Ninong |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#73 |
|
Governor
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Clearwater, FL
Posts: 1,234
|
Well, it finally made it from the garage into the house. Still waiting on a few pieces of equipment - mainly the skimmer and calcium reactor. Although I could start it up without the calcium reactor, I don't think I wanna try starting it up without the skimmer.
__________________
Bubba Hmmm... now that the tank is full, I could convert the pool to saltwater... Bubba's Aquarium Log |
|
|
|
|
|
#74 |
|
Owner
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Bardstown, KY
Posts: 13,047
|
Ah, that's got to feel great!
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#75 |
|
Governor
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Clearwater, FL
Posts: 1,234
|
Well, yeah it does, but it also makes me more impatient! I want it up and running NOW!
I couldn't resist any longer... I had been wanting a blue M. capricornis for the new tank. I've only seen them rarely online for sale and haven't seen any in the LFSs. Well, today, I found one. I jumped on it. Fortunately it's a small frag and I found a spot in my very crowded 75 gallon tank. It must be a corollary to Murphy's Law. You always find the coral you've been looking for when you run out of room in the tank.
__________________
Bubba Hmmm... now that the tank is full, I could convert the pool to saltwater... Bubba's Aquarium Log |
|
|
|
|
|
#76 |
|
Citizen
|
Looking great Bubba... Nice to see it starting to come together. I'm excited for you.
One piece of advice.. NO BRASS!!!.. LOL At least I can laugh now, so im getting there. ![]() BTW... I didn't use any silicone on my bulkheads and have had no issues. Jack
__________________
It's not a hobby, it's an addiction! _____________________________ Jack |
|
|
|
|
|
#77 |
|
Keeper of Willis
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NW Montana
Posts: 5,976
|
Bubba, as far as skimmers go, find the one that fits your tank, then go one size up, I don't think you will be sorry.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#78 |
|
Governor
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Clearwater, FL
Posts: 1,234
|
Jack, lemme know if you need help acid washing your tank... I'd be happy to make the trip to help out. Acid + acetone at Home Depot is less than $10 ... I checked the prices this week.
Charlie, I'm on the waiting list for a Barr SK1620.... rated 100-500 gallons... Brent said it should do just fine. The SK1220 is rated up to 300 gallons, so I bumped up one model. ![]()
__________________
Bubba Hmmm... now that the tank is full, I could convert the pool to saltwater... Bubba's Aquarium Log |
|
|
|
|
|
#79 |
|
Moderator
|
YAY!!!!
It's..... almost alive! |
|
|
|
|
|
#80 | |
|
Citizen
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: So. Calif.
Posts: 188
|
Quote:
Unfortunately my spawn have to be fed this month. Shay (who thinks priorities suck sometimes) P.S. Your tank is very cool. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Perfecto! | Boostable | Tanks, Filtration & Basic Equipment | 1 | 02-01-2006 07:10 AM |
| Trade 55 gallon for 20 gallon or for a sump. | polyspots | For Sale or Trade Zone | 4 | 04-13-2004 02:16 AM |
| 150 Gal. Perfecto Reef Tank w/ Dual Overflows Fallston, MD GREAT DEAL! | MartyD | For Sale or Trade Zone | 1 | 06-22-2002 11:31 PM |
| 150 Gal Perfecto Reef Ready York, PA | MartyD | For Sale or Trade Zone | 1 | 03-21-2002 08:06 AM |
| WTT: in MI-46 Gallon Bowfront Tank/Acc. for 200+ Gallon Protein skimmer | Fishguru | For Sale or Trade Zone | 0 | 10-22-2001 07:19 PM |